Environmental Ethics 43 (4):291-314 (2021)

Authors
Michel Bourban
University of Lausanne
Abstract
This article explains how strong sustainability ethics has emerged and developed as a new field over the last two decades as a critical response to influential conceptions of weak sustainability. It investigates three competing, normative approaches to strong sustainability: the communitarian approach, the Rawlsian approach, and the capabilities approach. Although these approaches converge around the idea that there are critical, non-substitutable natural resources and services, they diverge on how to reconcile human development and environmental protection. The aim of the paper is to provide a critical overview of these three perspectives, but also and mostly to show that when we put them into dialogue with each other, we can clarify the demands of sustainability. The paper concludes that the capabilities approach is the most suitable way to think about sustainability, but only if it goes beyond its dominantly anthropocentric view.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Social and Political Philosophy  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics202211332
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Truths Don’T Matter: The Case of Strong Sustainability.C. Tyler DesRoches - 2019 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 22 (2):184-196.
Tax Avoidance as a Sustainability Problem.Robert Bird & Karie Davis-Nozemack - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 151 (4):1009-1025.
Climate Change Mitigation, Sustainability and Non-Substitutability.Säde Hormio - 2017 - In Adrian Walsh, Säde Hormio & Duncan Purves (eds.), The Ethical Underpinnings of Climate Economics. London, UK: pp. 103-121.
Defining Sustainability.Jeffry L. Ramsey - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (6):1049-1054.
Business Ethics: A Sustainable Approach.Ken Rushton - 2002 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (2):137–139.
Business Ethics: A Sustainable Approach.Ken Rushton - 2002 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (2):137-139.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-01-19

Total views
6 ( #1,137,914 of 2,520,805 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,225 of 2,520,805 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes