Personification without Impossible Content

British Journal of Aesthetics 58 (2):165-179 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Personification has received little philosophical attention, but Daniel Nolan has recently argued that it has important ramifications for the relationship between fictional representation and possibility. Nolan argues that personification involves the representation of metaphysically impossible identities, which is problematic for anyone who denies that fictions can have impossible content. We develop an account of personification which illuminates how personification enhances engagement with fiction, without need of impossible content. Rather than representing an identity, personification is something that is done with representations—a matter of use rather than content—and involves only a comparison of possibilities. We illustrate our account using the personification of death in the film Meet Joe Black, and show that there are no grounds for taking it to be fictionally true that there is a metaphysically impossible identity between Death and death.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personification and Impossible Fictions.Daniel Nolan - 2015 - British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (1):57-69.
Are Impossible Worlds Trivial?Mark Jago - 2013 - In Vit Puncochar & Petr Svarny (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2012. College Publications.
Omission impossible.Sara Bernstein - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (10):2575-2589.
Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy.Alex Dressler - 2016 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Aggregate rationality in adjudication and legislation.Lewis A. Kornhauser - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):5-27.
Impossible Worlds.Mark Jago - 2013 - Noûs 47 (3):713-728.
the Personification Of Death In Some Ancient Religions.S. G. F. Brandon - 1961 - Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 43 (2):317-335.
The Impossible: An Essay on Hyperintensionality.Mark Jago - 2014 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Impossible Worlds: A Modest Approach.Daniel Nolan - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):535-572.
Constructing worlds.Mark Jago - 2012 - Synthese 189 (1):59-74.
Поняття «дух», «духовність» і «особистість»: Філософський зміст та взаємозв’язок.В. О Сабадуха - 2017 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 68:98-110.
Impossibility and Impossible Worlds.Daniel Nolan - 2018 - In Otávio Bueno & Scott A. Shalkowski (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Modality. New York: Routledge. pp. 40-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-04

Downloads
29 (#521,313)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Emily Caddick Bourne
University of Manchester
Craig Bourne
University of Hertfordshire

Citations of this work

Impossible Fictions Part I: Lessons for Fiction.Daniel Nolan - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (2):1-12.
Truth in interactive fiction.Alex Fisher - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-18.
Elusive Fictional Truth.Craig Bourne & Emily Caddick Bourne - 2022 - British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (1):15-31.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What Metaphors Mean.Donald Davidson - 1978 - Critical Inquiry 5 (1):31-47.
What metaphors mean.Donald Davidson - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 31.
Personification and Impossible Fictions.Daniel Nolan - 2015 - British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (1):57-69.

Add more references