European Journal of Women's Studies 24 (3):202-217 (2017)
AbstractBureaucracy has had few admirers, as a quick perusal of 20th-century political and social theory readily indicates. In recent years, several feminist theorists have also joined this vociferous anti-bureaucracy chorus, denouncing bureaucracy’s excessively hierarchical, impersonal, cold and controlling nature. The goal of this article is to review these charges and to show why the term ‘caring bureaucracy’ is not an oxymoron. In the first two sections, the author considers the various reasons why bureaucratic structures are said to be bad both for the people who work in them and for those who deal with them. The author proposes to discuss these charges in light of some research on feminist organizations and street-level bureaucracy. The intention is not to offer a paean to street-level discretion or to the claims of ‘the heart’ in public service; it is, rather, to underscore at once the beauty and the danger of discretion. It is also noted that feminist theorists ought to be cautious when they call for ‘flattened hierarchies’ and for fewer rules in large institutions – for these might work against the best interests of women. The last part of the article offers the outline of a caring bureaucracy and suggests avenues to be explored in future care ethics research.
Similar books and articles
"He Who is Unfit to Serve his Fellow Citizens Wants to Rule Them"--the Political Dimensions of Mises' Theory of Bureaucracy.Laurent Carnis - 2011 - Journal des Economistes Et des Etudes Humaines 17 (1).
Whither the Welfare State? Professionalization, Bureaucracy, and the Market Alternative:Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Michael Lipsky; People-Processing: The Street-Level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies. Jeffrey Manditch Prottas; The Welfare Industry: Functionaries and Reprients in Public Aid. David Street, Georte T. Martin, Jr., Laura Kramer; Social Welfare: Why and How? Noel Timms. [REVIEW]Clarence N. Stone - 1983 - Ethics 93 (3):588-.
A review of women’s intellectual contribution under the bureaucracy in Pakistan. [REVIEW]Salman Ahmed Khatani & Ghazal Khawaja Hummayun Akhtar - 2019 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 29 (4):138-141.
To Kill the King Post-Traditional Governance and Bureaucracy.David John Farmer - 2005 - M E Sharpe.
Education and Bureaucracy.Robert Boyd Skipper - 2018 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (1):57-76.
Introductory Remarks to the Fourth International Conference on the Comparative Historical and Critical Analysis of Bureaucracy: Bureaucracy and Culture.Ruth Esther Moser - 1985 - Dialogue: Administrative Theory & Praxis 7 (3).
I—Elizabeth Anderson: Expanding the Egalitarian Toolbox: Equality and Bureaucracy.Elizabeth Anderson - 2008 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):139-160.
Research ethics review and the bureaucracy.Paul M. McNeill - 2002 - Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S72-S73.
Is Bureaucracy Compatible with Democracy?Sandy Koll - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):134-145.
Managing Sick Leave in the University: Bureaucracy and Discretion.Chrystal Jaye, Lauralie Richard, Claire Amos & Geoff Noller - 2021 - Humanistic Management Journal 6 (2):211-227.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Reimagining Government with the Ethics of Care: A Department of Care.Maggie FitzGerald - 2020 - Ethics and Social Welfare 14 (3):248-265.
References found in this work
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.Joan Acker - 1990 - Gender and Society 4 (2):139-158.
Moral Boundaries a Political Argument for an Ethic of Care.Joan C. Tronto - 1993 - Psychology Press.
Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose.Joan C. Tronto - 2010 - Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2):158-171.
Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory.Nancy Fraser - 1989 - Hypatia 6 (2):225-228.
The Place of Care: The Relevance of the Feminist Ethic of Care for Social Policy.Selma Sevenhuijsen - 2003 - Feminist Theory 4 (2):179-197.