Metaphysical realism as a pre-condition of visual perception

Biology and Philosophy 19 (2):243-261 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I present a transcendental argument based on the findings of cognitive psychology and neurophysiology which invites two conclusions: First and foremost, that a pre-condition of visual perception itself is precisely what the Aristotelian and other commonsense realists maintain, namely, the independent existence of a featured, or pre-packaged world; second, this finding, combined with other reflections, suggests that, contra McDowell and other neo-Kantians, human beings have access to things as they are in the world via non-projective perception. These two conclusions taken together form the basis of Aristotelian metaphysical realism and a refutation of the neo-Kantian two-factor approach to perception

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
282 (#69,137)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Boulter
Oxford Brookes University

Citations of this work

Objects limit human comprehension.Philip Richard Sullivan - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (1):65-79.
La relatividad conceptual y el problema de la verdad.Antonio Diéguez - 2020 - Scientia in Verba Magazine 6 (1):105-120.
Education from a Biological Point of View.Stephen Boulter - 2016 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 36 (2):167-182.
Preconceptual intelligibility in perception.Daniel Dwyer - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (4):533-553.
Kitcher’s modest realism: The reconceptualization of scientific objectivity.Antonio Dieguez - 2010 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):141-169.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.Wilfrid Sellars - 1956 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1:253-329.

View all 38 references / Add more references