Heidegger, technology and ecology

South African Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):157-172 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article investigates Heidegger's views on technology, specifically focussing on whether it is possible to fit Heidegger's ideas into an ecologically minded framework. The author concludes that the question of what we should do in the wake of the technological crisis we face is inappropriate in terms of Heidegger's philosophy, since he proposes that we should first tackle the question “What should we think?”. The question whether Heidegger's ideas on technology provide us with new paths of action, specifically in terms of ecological practice, is flawed. S. Afr. J. Philos. Vol.22(2) 2003: 157–172

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Concerning Technology.Tracy Colony - 2009 - Idealistic Studies 39 (1-3):23-34.
What's wrong with being a technological essentialist? A response to Feenberg.Iain Thomson - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):429 – 444.
The ontic and the ontological in Heidegger's philosophy of technology: Response to Thomson.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):445 – 450.
On Heidegger, medicine, and the modernity of modern medical technology.Iain Brassington - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (2):185-195.
Heidegger's Aporetic Ontology of Technology.Dana S. Belu & Andrew Feenberg - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):1-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
57 (#269,932)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Catherine Botha
University of Johannesburg

References found in this work

Heidegger and Sartre: An Essay on Being and Place.Joseph P. Fell - 1979 - New York: Columbia University Press.

Add more references