Genes, memes, and the chinese concept of Wen : Toward a nature/culture model of genetics

Philosophy East and West 60 (2):pp. 167-186 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Chinese concept of wen is examined here in the context of contemporary gene theory and the "cultural branch" of gene theory called "memetics." The Chinese notion of wen is an untranslatable term meaning "pattern," "structure," "writing," and "literature." Wen hua—generally translated as "culture"—signifies the process through which one adopts wen. However, this process is not simply one of civilizational mimesis or imitation but the "creation" of a new pattern. Within a gene-wen debate we are able to read genes neither in terms of nature or culture but, in a Chinese way, in terms of "nature-culture." "Posthuman" or "transhuman" models that celebrate the creation of techno-biobodies (cyborgs) as the continuation of the human by nonhuman means are still dependent on a clear distinction between nature and technology (culture) that is rooted in the Greek and Christian traditions. bioengineering does not do more than gradually replacing the "given" by the "made" until the body is seen as a commodity malleable in the hands of modern technology. A wen-based genetics offers a new perspective on nature-culture continuity because it is not trapped in nature but involved in a concept of wen that a Western mind tends to identify too quickly with natural necessity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-04-17

Downloads
107 (#151,847)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thorsten Botz-Bornstein
Gulf University For Science And Technology

Citations of this work

Patterns of Tao : The Birth of Chinese Writing and Aesthetics.Ming Dong Gu - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (2):151-163.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references