Some Notes on the Meaning of the Term 'substantia' in the Tradition of Aristotle's Categories

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Abelard's Theory of Relations: Reductionism and the Aristotelian Tradition.Jeffrey E. Brower - 1998 - Review of Metaphysics 51 (3):605-631.
Aristotle: a collection of critical essays.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1968 - Melbourne,: Macmillan.
On Aristotle's Categories.S. Marc Cohen & Gareth B. Matthews - 1991 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Edited by S. Marc Cohen & Gareth B. Matthews.
Chasing Aristotle’s Categories Down the Tree of Grammar.Michael R. Baumer - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:341-449.
The Categories and Aristotle's Ontology.Mohan Matthen - 1978 - Dialogue 17 (2):228-243.
Did Plotinus and Porphyry disagree on Aristotle's Categories?Frans De Haas - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (4):492-526.
Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's "Categories"?Frans A. J. De Haas - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (4):492 - 526.
Categories.Amie Thomasson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotle.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1967 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-27

Downloads
19 (#753,814)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references