Self-Locating Belief in Big Worlds: Cosmology’s Missing Link to Observation

Journal of Philosophy 99 (12):607-623 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Current cosmological theories say that the world is so big that all possible observations are in fact made. But then, how can such theories be tested? What could count as negative evidence? To answer that, we need to consider observation selection effects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defeating dr. evil with self-locating belief.Adam Elga - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):383–396.
Being at the Centre: Self-location in Thought and Language.Clas Weber - 2016 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Stephan Torre (eds.), About Oneself: De Se Thought and Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 246-271.
Bayesianism And Self-Locating Beliefs.Darren Bradley - 2007 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Agreement theorems for self-locating belief.Michael Caie - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):380-407.
Self-locating Priors and Cosmological Measures.Frank Arntzenius & Cian Dorr - 2017 - In Khalil Chamcham, John Barrow, Simon Saunders & Joe Silk (eds.), The Philosophy of Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 396-428.
Edward Milne's influence on modern cosmology.Thomas Lepeltier - 2006 - Annals of Science 63 (4):471-481.
The inessential quasi-indexical.Peter Alward - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (2):235 - 255.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
116 (#148,562)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nick Bostrom
Oxford University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references