Ethical Argumentation [Book Review]

Idealistic Studies 17 (3):277-278 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In light of Hsün Tzu’s account of drawing distinctions in support of certain pragmatic ends, one might say there are three classes of readers of A. S. Cua’s book. The first is of those who are at home in Literary Chinese; the second is of those, like this reviewer, who read very little of the language; and the third is of readers with no Chinese. The first class will doubtless be engaged by the linguistic studies conducted, for example, in Chapter 3. This work seems useful to me and I benefited from a discussion of wei-constructions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review. [REVIEW]Bongkil Chung - 1986 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 13 (4):459-470.
Lu Hsün Hui I Lu Chung Lu Hsün Yen Lun Chai Pien.Hsün Lu & Fu tan ta hsüeh - 1981 - Center for Chinese Research Materials, Association of Research Libraries.
Hsun Tzu’s Moral Epistemology.John Marshall - 1987 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14 (4):487-500.
A Study On The Concept Of Hsun Tzu's "chieh-pi-hsin".Hsiao-Huei Pan - 1998 - Philosophy and Culture 25 (6):516-536.
Ethical Argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 2003 - Lexington Books.
Contemporary Ethical Autonomism: A Critical Study of Sartre and Hare.Wei-Hsun Fu - 1969 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
28 (#538,947)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references