Kirstin Borgerson
Dalhousie University
Proponents of evidence-based medicine have recently suggested a “4S” approach to clinical decision making in which physicians are advised to rely on increasingly abstract summaries of the available research evidence. This retreat from the original data of medical research is ill-advised: it extends an unjustified evidence hierarchy, overestimates the role of computer systems, divides communities, discards evidence, ignores contexts, and devalues broad critical evaluation. I draw upon feminist social epistemology to evaluate the 4S approach to EBM and to suggest means for improving the evidence base of medical research and practice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/fab.2009.2.2.152
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Amending and Defending Critical Contextual Empiricism.Kirstin Borgerson - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (3):435-449.
An Argument for Fewer Clinical Trials.Kirstin Borgerson - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (6):25-35.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Evidence‐Based Medicine. The Good the Bad and the Ugly. A Clinician's Perspective.Kumanan Wilson - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):398-400.
The Hard Art of Soft Science: Evidence‐Based Medicine, Reasoned Medicine or Both?Milos Jenicek - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (4):410-419.
Beyond Evidence-Based Medicine: Bridge-Building a Medicine of Meaning.S. Buetow - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (2):103-108.
A Critical Appraisal of Evidence‐Based Medicine: Some Ethical Considerations.M. Gupta - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):111-121.
A Popperian Perspective of the Term 'Evidence‐Based Medicine'.Eyal Shahar - 1997 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 3 (2):109-116.
Ideas and Ideals in Medicine: Fruits of Reason or Props of Power?Olli S. Miettinen - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (2):107-116.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #337,323 of 2,519,276 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,748 of 2,519,276 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes