Philosophy of Science 2 (2):236-245 (1935)

Abstract
It is the traditional view of psychology that the attributes of sensation show a one-to-one correspondence to the dimensions of the stimulus. Some such view is also implicit in the naïve epistemology of the physicist. He often thinks of pitch as if it were the perception of the frequency of a tone, but that view soon runs into difficulties. Within psychology it was Wundt who originally equipped sensation with two attributes, quality and intensity, thus making sensations mirror the more obvious aspects of stimuli which differ as to kind and in degree. Later it became clear to Külpe that extension must be an attribute of visual and tactual sensations because the retina and the skin are areal organs and because extent enters into perception quite as ‘immediately’ as does intensity. A loud sound is not a congeries of faint sounds, nor is a perceived line a row of sensations. In a similar reaction against Wundtian atomism Külpe also added duration to the list, for a tone that lasts 0.8 sec. yields a different perception from one that lasts 0.6 sec. and yet there is no sense to saying that the first represents a greater number of seried sensations than the second. Thus the four classical attributes of sensation are quality, intensity, extensity and protensity. The conventional view has been that they are respectively correlated with four aspects of the stimulus, and this paper is written with the intention of refuting this view.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/286365
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hubris to Humility: Tonal Volume and the Fundamentality of Psychophysical Quantities.Alistair M. C. Isaac - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 65:99-111.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Physical Entropy and the Senses.Kenneth H. Norwich - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (3):167-180.
What is It Like to Like?William S. Robinson - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (6):743-765.
Binding by Synchronisation: A Task-Dependence Hypothesis.Guido Bugmann - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):685-686.
The Divine Attributes.Nicholas Everitt - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):78-90.
Stimulus, Sensation, and Meaning.Glenn D. Higginson - 1935 - Journal of Philosophy 32 (24):645-650.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
80 ( #143,200 of 2,498,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes