Negotiating Between Learner and Mathematics: A Conceptual Framework to Analyze Teacher Sensitivity Toward Constructivism in a Mathematics Classroom

Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):59-69 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Context: Constructivist teachers who find themselves working within an educational system that adopts a realist epistemology, may find themselves at odds with their own beliefs when they catch themselves paying closer attention to the knowledge authorities intend them to teach rather than the knowledge being constructed by their learners. Method: In the preliminary analysis of the mathematical learning of six low-performing Year 7 boys in a Maltese secondary school, whom one of us taught during the scholastic year 2014-15, we constructed a conceptual framework which would help us analyze the extent to which he managed to be sensitive to constructivism in a typical classroom setting. We describe the development of the framework M-N-L as a viable analytical tool to search for significant moments in the lessons in which the teacher appeared to engage in what we define as “constructivist teaching” during mathematics lessons. The development of M-N-L is part of a research program investigating the way low-performing students make mathematical sense of new notation with the help of the software Grid Algebra. Results: M-N-L was found to be an effective instrument which helped to determine the extent to which the teacher was sensitive to his own constructivist beliefs while trying to negotiate a balance between the mathematical concepts he was expected to teach and the conceptual constructions of his students. Implications: One major implication is that it is indeed possible for mathematics teachers to be sensitive to the individual constructions of their learners without losing sight of the concepts that society, represented by curriculum planners, deems necessary for students to learn. The other is that researchers in the field of education may find M-N-L a helpful tool to analyze CT during typical didactical situations established in classroom settings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Negotiating the Classroom.J. Richards - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):78-78.
What Do We Lose If We Abandon Constructivism?B. Jaworski - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):73-75.
Toward a Model of Constructivist Mathematics Teaching.L. P. Steffe - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):75-77.
Mathematical Observers Observing Mathematics.J. Proulx - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):80-82.
When Is a Constructivist not a Constructivist?T. McCloughlin - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):79-80.
Revisiting the Efficacy of Constructivism in Mathematics Education.Mdutshekelwa Ndlovu - 2013 - Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal 27 (April):1-13.
Mathematics in the Classroom: Conceptual Cartography of Differential Calculus.de Lourdes Rodr - 2015 - Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 7 (2):47-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-15

Downloads
19 (#750,145)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references