Synthese 130 (3):379-387 (2002)
AbstractThe literature on thought experiments has been mainly concerned with thought experiments that are directed at a theory, be it in a constructive or a destructive manner. This has led some philosophers to argue that all thought experiments can be formulated as arguments. The aim of this paper is to draw attention to a type of thought experiment that is not directed at a theory, but fulfills a specific function within a theory. Such thought experiments are referred to as functional thought experiments, and they are routinely used in applied statistics. An example is given from frequentist statistics, where a thought experiment is required to establish the probability space. It is concluded that (a) not all thought experiments can be formulated as arguments, and (b) the role of thought experiments is more general and more important to scientific reasoning than has previously been recognized
Similar books and articles
Logical Connectives for Constructive Modal Logic.Heinrich Wansing - 2006 - Synthese 150 (3):459-482.
The Philosophical Roots of Ernst Mach's Economy of Thought. E. Banks - 2004 - Synthese 139 (1):23-53.
Thought Experiments and a priori Knowledge.Vladimir Filatov - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):17-27.
Problems of Philosophy. Problem #24: Different "Language Games" in Logic and Epistemology.[author unknown] - 2000 - Synthese 122 (3):377-377.
On Relational and Functional Languages.Vladimir Shalack - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (1):25-32.
Problems Of Philosophy; Problem #30: An Epistemology for Game-Theoretical Semantics.[author unknown] - 2000 - Synthese 124 (3):447-447.
Concepts and Aims of Functional Interpretations: Towards a Functional Interpretation of Constructive Set Theory.Wolfgang Burr - 2002 - Synthese 133 (1-2):257 - 274.
Problems of Philosophy Problem #12: Epistemology From a Strategic Viewpoint.[author unknown] - 1998 - Synthese 116 (1):113-113.
Tracing the Development of Thought Experiments in the Philosophy of Natural Sciences.Aspasia S. Moue, Kyriakos A. Masavetas & Haido Karayianni - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):61-75.
Problems of Philosophy. Problem #27: First-Order Logic as the Logic of Skolem Operators.[author unknown] - 2000 - Synthese 123 (3):405-405.
Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism.John D. Norton - 2002 - In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell. pp. 44-66.
Prècis of Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. [REVIEW]Susan Haack - 1997 - Synthese 112 (1):7-11.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Thought Experiments.Yiftach J. H. Fehige & James R. Brown - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 25 (1):135-142.
Thought Experiments in Ethics.Georg Brun - 2017 - In Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach J. H. Fehige & James Robert Brown (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. pp. 195–210.
When Are Thought Experiments Poor Ones?Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):305-322.
How to Reconstruct a Thought Experiment.Marek Picha - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (2):154-188.
Evaluating the Cognitive Success of Thought Experiments.Damián Islas Mondragón - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 3:68-76.
References found in this work
Consciousness Explained.Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):905-910.
The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences.James Robert Brown - 1991 - Routledge.