Functional Thought Experiments

Synthese 130 (3):379-387 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The literature on thought experiments has been mainly concernedwith thought experiments that are directed at a theory, be it in aconstructive or a destructive manner. This has led somephilosophers to argue that all thought experiments can beformulated as arguments. The aim of this paper is to drawattention to a type of thought experiment that is not directed ata theory, but fulfills a specific function within a theory. Suchthought experiments are referred to as functional thoughtexperiments, and they are routinely used in applied statistics. An example is given from frequentist statistics, where a thoughtexperiment is required to establish the probability space. It isconcluded that (a) not all thought experiments can be formulated asarguments, and (b) the role of thought experiments is more generaland more important to scientific reasoning than has previouslybeen recognized.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Acquaintance and de re Thought.Chris John Daly - 2007 - Synthese 156 (1):79-96.
Thought Experiments and a priori Knowledge.Vladimir Filatov - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):17-27.
Problems Of Philosophy.[author unknown] - 2000 - Synthese 122 (3):377-377.
On Relational and Functional Languages.Vladimir Shalack - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (1):25-32.
Evaluating Practical Reasoning.Douglas Walton - 2007 - Synthese 157 (2):197-240.
Problems of Philosophy Problem #12: Epistemology from a strategic viewpoint.[author unknown] - 1998 - Synthese 116 (1):113-113.
Tracing the Development of Thought Experiments in the Philosophy of Natural Sciences.Aspasia S. Moue, Kyriakos A. Masavetas & Haido Karayianni - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):61-75.
Problems of Philosophy.[author unknown] - 2000 - Synthese 123 (3):405-405.
A Companion to Relativism.Steven D. Hales (ed.) - 2010 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.


Added to PP

182 (#108,858)

6 months
14 (#184,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Thought Experiments.Yiftach J. H. Fehige & James R. Brown - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 25 (1):135-142.
Thought experiments in ethics.Georg Brun - 2018 - In Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige & James Robert Brown (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London: Routledge. pp. 195–210.
When are thought experiments poor ones?Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):305-322.
How to Reconstruct a Thought Experiment.Marek Picha - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (2):154-188.
Evaluating the Cognitive Success of Thought Experiments.Damián Islas Mondragón - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 3:68-76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Consciousness Explained.Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):905-910.
The taming of chance.Ian Hacking - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Logic of Statistical Inference.Ian Hacking - 1965 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Thought experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references