Defending the Martian Argument

Disputatio 1 (20):1 - 9 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Chomskian holds that the grammars that linguists produce are about human psycholinguistic structures, i.e. our mastery of a grammar, our linguistic competence. But if we encountered Martians whose psycholinguistic processes differed from ours, but who nevertheless produced sentences that are extensionally equivalent to the set of sentences in our English and shared our judgements on the grammaticality of various English sentences, then we would count them as being competent in English. A grammar of English is about what the Martians and we share. In this note, I argue that a recent attack on the Martian Argument by Laurence fail to mitigate its force.

Similar books and articles

Ignorance Radicalized.Gergo Somodi - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):140-156.
Could Competent Speakers Really Be Ignorant of Their Language?Robert J. Matthews - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):457-467.
Can psychology be a unified science?Lawrence A. Shapiro - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):953-963.
The poverty of the stimulus argument.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):217-276.
Linguistics, Psychology, and the Ontology of Language.Fritz J. McDonald - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):291-301.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-10

Downloads
721 (#21,536)

6 months
66 (#66,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steffen Borge
Nord University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references