Rights, Duties and the Body: Law and Ethics of the Maternal-Fetal Conflict

Philosophical Review 113 (4):582-584 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Suppose a woman chooses to carry a pregnancy to term. What duties should she be understood to have with respect to the fetus? If she is informed that a vaginal delivery will pose significant risks to its life or health, for example, is she obligated to submit to a caesarean section procedure on its behalf?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The case of Medea--a view of fetal-maternal conflict.M. C. Reid & G. Gillett - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (1):19-25.
Rights and duties.Carl Wellman (ed.) - 2002 - New York: Routledge.
Human rights and healthcare.Elizabeth Wicks - 2007 - Portland, Or.: Hart.
The human body and the law.David W. Meyers - 1970 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Real rights.Carl Wellman - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
100 (#167,230)

6 months
8 (#274,950)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Boonin
University of Colorado, Boulder

Citations of this work

Breastfeeding and defeasible duties to benefit.Fiona Woollard & Lindsey Porter - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (8):515-518.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references