Is Hume's principle analytic?

Logic, Logic, and Logic:301--314 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hume = small Hume.Jeffrey Ketland - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
A Puzzle About Ontological Commitments.Philip A. Ebert - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):209-226.
To err is humeant.Mark Wilson - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):247-257.
Who needs (to assume) Hume's principle?Andrew Boucher - manuscript
On Some Criticisms of Hume’s Principle of Proportioning Cause to Effect.John Beaudoin - 1999 - Philo 2 (2):26-40.
Hume on knowledge, certainty and probability: Anticipating the disintegration of the analytic/synthetic divide?Kevin Meeker - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):226–242.
Is Hume's principle analytic?Crispin Wright - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):307-333.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-18

Downloads
4 (#1,590,841)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Neo-fregeanism and quantifier variance.Theodore Sider - 2007 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):201–232.
New V, ZF and Abstraction.Stewart Shapiro & Alan Weir - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):293-321.
Frege meets dedekind: A neologicist treatment of real analysis.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):335--364.
Structuralist Neologicism†.Francesca Boccuni & Jack Woods - 2020 - Philosophia Mathematica 28 (3):296-316.

View all 47 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references