Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, §§ 82-3 [Book Review]

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):407-28 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper contains a close analysis of Frege's proofs of the axioms of arithmetic §§70-83 of Die Grundlagen, with special attention to the proof of the existence of successors in §§82-83. Reluctantly and hesitantly, we come to the conclusion that Frege was at least somewhat confused in those two sections and that he cannot be said to have outlined, or even to have intended, any correct proof there. The proof he sketches is in many ways similar to that given in Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, but fidelity to what Frege wrote in Die Grundlagen and in Grundgesetze requires us to reject the charitable suggestion that it was this (beautiful) proof that he had in mind in §§82-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-07

Downloads
424 (#44,488)

6 months
48 (#83,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism.Fraser MacBride - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):103-163.
Structural-Abstraction Principles.Graham Leach-Krouse - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica:nkv033.
Is Frege's Definition of the Ancestral Adequate?Richard G. Heck - 2016 - Philosophia Mathematica 24 (1):91-116.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Frege's conception of numbers as objects.Crispin Wright - 1983 - [Aberdeen]: Aberdeen University Press.
The Frege reader.Gottlob Frege & Michael Beaney (eds.) - 1997 - Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
Frege.Michael Dummett - 1973 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects.Crispin Wright - 1983 - Critical Philosophy 1 (1):97.

View all 14 references / Add more references