Review of Metaphysics 58 (4):916-917 (2005)

Thomas Bontly
University of Connecticut
A pleonastic entity is one whose existence can be validly inferred from statements making no reference to that entity. For instance, properties are pleonastic entities, since we can infer from “Sam is a goat” the pleonastic equivalent “Sam has the property of being a goat.” Inferences of this sort, which Schiffer calls something-from-nothing transformations, are conceptually valid; they are licensed by the concept of a property, since having the concept of a property just is knowing such things as that all F’s have the property of being an F. The hypostatization is harmless, however, since the properties thus added to our ontology are abstract entities with no impact on the causal structure of the world. The result is a deflationist conception of properties: yes, they exist mind-independently, but their natures are exhausted by our property-invoking inferential and linguistic practices. Where these leave individuative questions unsettled, the matter is simply indeterminate. One noteworthy consequence is that mental-physical property-identities, which many take to be knowable a posteriori, cannot be determinately true, there being nothing in our concept of being in pain that could help determine which such property pain would be.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph200558473
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Theories and Things.W. V. O. Quine (ed.) - 1981 - Harvard University Press.
‘All Things Considered’.Ruth Chang - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):1–22.
Thing and Object.Kristie Miller - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89.
Thomas Aquinas and Knowledge of Material Objects: Proper Objects of Cognition.Catherine Jack Deavel - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:269-278.
Desire.Philip Pettit - 1998 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Causality and Things in Themselves.Kent Baldner - 1988 - Synthese 77 (3):353 - 373.
The Things Things Say.Jonathan Lamb - 2011 - Princeton University Press.
What Things Still Don’T Do. [REVIEW]David M. Kaplan - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
Dreyfus and Spinosa on Things-in-Themselves.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):115 – 124.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #271,799 of 2,518,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes