Kantian Journal 39 (4):95-123 (2020)

At the beginning of the twentieth century in the Russian-speaking philosophical space philosophical projects emerged which brought ontology and gnoseology closer together. One can observe this process, for example, in the philosophical doctrines of the Russian intuitivists Nikolay Lossky and Semyon Frank. I demonstrate that the emergence of these doctrines and the development of their onto-gnoseological categorial apparatus were mainly connected with the criticism of the Neo-Kantian theory of cognition and the possibility of transcendent knowledge as such. The main sources of my study are The Intuitive Basis of Knowledge and The World as an Organic Whole by N. O. Lossky and The Object of Knowledge and The Unknowable by S. L. Frank. My investigation makes it possible to treat Lossky’s categorial framework as the representation of a system of levels of the universe each of which is characterised by two aspects: the ontological, i.e. it is part of the unity of the world, and the gnoseological, i.e. it has an independent cognitive significance. Frank considers categories to be an organic part of the ontological proof of intuitivism. A common trend in the construction of categorial schemes by Lossky and Frank is their striving to combine gnoseological and ontological descriptions of categories. The key difference is the way an onto-gnoseological system as a whole is justified. In revealing the contradictions in Lossky’s conception, I proceed from the critical remarks of S. A. Askoldov, pointing out that these contradictions stem from an absolutisation of intuition in cognition, the renunciation of the idea of gnoseological transcendence, incompleteness of the theory of immanence and discordance between onto-gnoseological categories. Askoldov’s critical comments clarify the substantive features of Lossky’s theory and the essence of the transformations carried out in Frank’s absolute ideal-realism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5922/0207-6918-2020-4-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logik der Reinen Erkenntniss.Hermann Cohen - 1903 - The Monist 13:633.
History of Russian Philosophy.N. O. Lossky - 1952 - Science and Society 16 (4):357-360.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Nikolay Lossky’s Cosmology.Gennadii Aliaiev & Svetlana Kutsepal - 2018 - Filosofiâ I Kosmologiâ 20:154-162.
Reading Russian Philosophy and Max Scheler Together: The Problem of the Other I.A. A. Tchikine - 2019 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (2):127-141.
Nikolai Lossky and Henri Bergson.Frédéric Tremblay - 2017 - Studies in East European Thought 69 (1):3-16.
“New Rhetoric” and Informal Logic.A. Politiuk - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (22):97-102.
The Main Provisions of Epistemology V. D. Kudryavtsev-Platonov: The Experience of Reconstructio.I. Pecheranskiy - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (22):102-108.
Advance to a New Theory of Cognition.Emiliya Taysina - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 75:215-219.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,199,068 of 2,498,790 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #210,517 of 2,498,790 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes