Theory and experiment. The case of eötvös' experiments

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (4):459-486 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By analysing the historical case of the proportionality between inertia and gravitation, it is possible to reconstruct one of the most relevant moments in the history of physics, that is to say, the one linked with Eötvös' experiments. At the same time, this reconstruction offers the opportunity to carry out philosophical considerations about the relationship between theory and experiment and about the concept of incommensurability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can planck's constant be measured with classical mechanics?Hasok Chang - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (3):223 – 243.
Experiments and thought experiments in natural science.David Atkinson - 2001 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 232:209-226.
Die Joule-Thomson-Experimente—Anmerkungen zur Materialität eines Experimentes.Christian Sichau - 2000 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 8 (1):222-243.
Why Thought Experiments are Not Arguments.Michael A. Bishop - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.
Aesthetic appreciation of experiments: The case of 18th-century mimetic experiments.Alexander Rueger - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (1):49 – 59.
How to Reconstruct a Thought Experiment.Marek Picha - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (2):154-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
385 (#49,213)

6 months
12 (#171,024)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references