Symbolism and linguistic semantics. Some questions (and confusions) from late antique neoplatonism up to eriugena

Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):238-252 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notion of 'symbol' in Eriugena's writing is far from clear. It has an ambiguous semantic connection with other terms such as 'signification', 'figure', 'allegory', 'veil', 'agalma', 'form', 'shadow', 'mystery' and so on. This paper aims to explore into the origins of such a semantic ambiguity, already present in the texts of the pseudo-Dionysian corpus which Eriugena translated and commented upon. In the probable Neoplatonic sources of this corpus, the Greek term symbolon shares some aspects of its meaning with other words inherited from the ancient tradition, such as synthēma , eikōn , homoiotēs. Some of them, such as eikōn and homoiotēs, belong to the field of images and are associated with linguistic semantics in the Neoplatonic commentaries not only to Plato but also to Aristotle's logical works. Among the late ancient Neoplatonists, particular attention is paid to Proclus and to his use of the term agalma. In fact, the textual history of this word seems to be a privileged perspective from which to reconstruct the Neoplatonic semantic blending of symbol and image, as well as the main role played by linguistic issues in this conflation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,509

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
79 (#152,054)

6 months
2 (#277,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Costantino Marmo
Università degli Studi di Bologna

Citations of this work

Religious Symbols.Daniel Whistler - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (11):730-742.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references