Introduction: Disagreement—Epistemological and Argumentation-Theoretic Perspectives

&
Topoi 40 (5):963-969 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11245-021-09776-9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Introduction: The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation--A Map.Christoph Lumer - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (3):189-212.
Argumentation and the epistemology of disagreement.Harvey Siegal - unknown
Deep Disagreement and the Virtues of Argumentative and Epistemic Incapacity.Jeremy Barris - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (3):369-408.
The Methodological Usefulness of Deep Disagreement.Steven W. Patterson - 2015 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 6 (2).
Courageous Arguments and Deep Disagreements.Andrew Aberdein - 2019 - Topoi 40 (5):1205-1212.
The Compliment of Rational Opposition: Disagreement, Adversariality, and Disputation.David Godden - 2021 - Topoi 40 (5):845-858.
Skeptical Arguments and Deep Disagreement.Guido Melchior - 2023 - Erkenntnis 88 (5):1869-1893.
Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement.Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (1):39-65.
Metatheories of disagreement: Introduction.Péter Hartl & Ákos Gyarmathy - 2021 - Metaphilosophy 52 (3-4):337-347.
What should a normative theory of argumentation look like?Bermejo-Luque Lilian - unknown
Problems of Deep Disagreement.Artur Ravilevich Karimov - 2019 - Dialogue and Universalism 29 (2):239-242.
The Universe as an Argument: Argumentative function—a Peircean orientation.Philip Rose - unknown
Useful argumentation: a critique of the epistemological approach.Brian Huss - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (3):261-275.
Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation.Michael P. Weinstock - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (1):103-120.
Wittgenstein and the logic of deep disagreement.David Godden & William H. Brenner - 2010 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 2:41-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-11

Downloads
46 (#337,879)

6 months
16 (#148,627)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Patrick Bondy
Wichita State University
David Godden
Michigan State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rationality’s Fixed Point.Michael G. Titelbaum - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 5.
Epistemological puzzles about disagreement.Richard Feldman - 2006 - In Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press. pp. 216-236.
Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology.Annalisa Coliva - 2015 - London, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.

View all 26 references / Add more references