Philosophia 44 (4):1209-1228 (2016)

Authors
Jochen Bojanowski
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Abstract
Are our actions morally good because we approve of them or are they good independently of our approval? Are we projecting moral values onto the world or do we detect values that are already there? For many these questions don’t state a real alternative but a secular variant of the Euthyphro dilemma: If our actions are good because we approve of them moral goodness appears to be arbitrary. If they are good independently of our approval, it is unclear how we come to know their moral quality and how moral knowledge can be motivating. None of these options seems attractive; the source of moral goodness unclear. Despite the growing literature on Kant’s moral epistemology and moral epistemology the question remains open what Kant’s answer to this apparent dilemma is. The Kantian view I attempt to lay out in this paper is supposed to dissolve the secular version of the Euthyphro dilemma. In responding to this dilemma we need to get clear about the source or the origin of our moral knowledge: Voluntary approval or mind-independent moral facts? Projectivism or detectivism? Construction or given? I believe that all these ways of articulating the problem turn out, on closer inspection, to be false alternatives.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-016-9747-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Sources of Normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.John Rawls - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine Korsgaard - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):384-394.
Kantian Ethics.Allen W. Wood - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Naturalism and Realism in Kant’s Ethics.Jochen Bojanowski - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (3):463-474.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Theistic Activism and the Euthyphro Dilemma.David James Baggett - 2002 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
Divine Moral Goodness, Supererogation and The Euthyphro Dilemma.Alfred Archer - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (2):147-160.
A Way Out of the Euthyphro Dilemma.Nick Zangwill - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (1):7 - 13.
Euthyphro, the Good, and the Right.John Milliken - 2009 - Philosophia Christi 11 (1):149-159.
A New Euthyphro.Glenn Peoples - 2010 - Think 9 (25):65-83.
God's Creation of Morality.Tim Mawson - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (1):1-25.
Ethics and God.Lenn E. Goodman - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 34 (2):135-150.
Moral Realism and Arbitrariness.Jason Kawall - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):109-129.
Moral Dilemmas and the Priority Thesis.Julie Mary Mcdonald - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-08

Total views
51 ( #220,125 of 2,498,022 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #171,501 of 2,498,022 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes