The semiotic status of commands

Philosophy of Science 12 (4):302-315 (1945)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The large number of writers who have in recent years attacked the problem of the logical nature of commands appear generally in agreement in accepting the distinction of common grammar between imperative and declarative sentences as representing, albeit in no clear one-to-one manner, some real difference in the logical character of the two types of expression, and possibly in the psychological sign-functioning mechanism itself. The crucial logical difference adduced is that commands can apparently rot be classified as true or false. One is then, however, confronted with the problem of interpreting arguments involving imperatives which appear syllogistic in form, such as:Keep your promises!You promised to pay on Wednesday.Pay on Wednesday!

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#434,396)

6 months
6 (#349,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Inquiries Into Truth And Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Deontic logic.Paul McNamara - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Meaning without content: on the metasemantics of register.Thorsten Sander - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Imperatives.Brian F. Chellas - 1971 - Theoria 37 (2):114-129.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On the logic of imperatives.Albert Hofstadter & J. C. C. McKinsey - 1939 - Philosophy of Science 6 (4):446-457.
Logical Empiricism.Herbet Feigl - 1943 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):148-148.
Imperatives and Logic.Afl Ross - 1941 - Theoria 7 (1):53.
Are moral judgments assertions?Abraham Kaplan - 1942 - Philosophical Review 51 (3):280-303.
Value-Statements.Justus Buchler - 1936 - Analysis 4 (4):49 - 58.

Add more references