Reply to Amini and Caldwell, “Boghossian’s Refutation of Relativism”

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 2 (1):45-49 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Majid Amini and Christopher Caldwell charge that I misconstrue the relation between relativism and constructivism, on the one hand, and between relativism and skepticism, on the other. In this brief response, I rebut their charges.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relativism and reflexivity.Robert Lockie - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (3):319 – 339.
Is Protagorean Relativism Self-Refuting?Jack W. Meiland - 1979 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 9 (1):51-68.
In defense of epistemic relativism.Ram Neta - 2007 - Episteme 4 (1):30-48.
Kant's refutation of idealism: A reply to Chignell.Georges Dicker - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):175-183.
A consistent relativism.Steven D. Hales - 1997 - Mind 106 (421):33-52.
The logic of relative systems.M. R. Ressler - 2009 - Dissertation, University of Melbourne
Meiland and the Self-Refutation of Protagorean Relativism.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 23 (1):119-128.
Thoroughly Relativistic Perspectives.Mark Ressler - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (1):89-112.
The theory of social forces.-A reply.W. Caldwell - 1897 - International Journal of Ethics 7 (4):496-497.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
67 (#238,055)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Boghossian
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations