Critical Thinking and Constructivism: Mambo Dog Fish to the Banana Patch

Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):73-84 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Constructivist pedagogies cannot achieve their critical thinking ambitions. Constructivism, and constructivist epistemological presuppositions, actively thwarts the critical thinking process. Using Wittgenstein's private language argument, this paper argues that corrective mechanisms—the ability to correct a student's propositions and cognitions against the background of a shared, knowable world—are indispensible to critical thinking. This paper provides concrete examples of actual constructivist practice and shows how a particular constructivist classroom exercise can be modified to incorporate critical thinking elements as detailed by the American Philosophical Association. Finally, the paper states the significance of these arguments, particularly as they extend from the educational arena into the public and governmental domains

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life.Kal Alston - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Learning, Critical Thinking, and Confucius.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:79-84.
Critical Thinking.Robert Ennis - 1991 - Teaching Philosophy 14 (1):4-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-08

Downloads
120 (#146,688)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Boghossian
Portland State University

Citations of this work

The Socratic method, defeasibility, and doxastic responsibility.Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (3):244-253.

Add more citations