Authors
Ruth Boeker
University College Dublin
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to show that Shaftesbury’s thinking about liberty is best understood in terms of self-mastery. To examine his understanding of liberty, I turn to a painting that he commissioned on the ancient theme of the choice of Hercules and the notes that he prepared for the artist. Questions of human choice are also present in the so-called story of an amour, which addresses the difficulties of controlling human passions. Jaffro distinguishes three notions of self-control that are present in the story of an amour. Although I agree with many aspects of Jaffro’s interpretation, I question his conclusion that self- control in the Stoic sense is best reserved for ‘moral heroes.’ I propose an alternative developmental interpretation, according to which all human beings are on an intellectual journey aimed at personal and moral improvement. My interpretation takes seriously that for Shaftesbury philosophy is meant to be practical and help improve our lives. I end by arguing that rather than trying to situate Shaftesbury’s concept of liberty within debates among compatibilists and incompatibilists it is more promising to understand it in terms of self- mastery and thus regard it as a version of positive liberty.
Keywords Shaftesbury  liberty  positive liberty  self-mastery  personal development
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/09672559.2019.1674362
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government.Philip Pettit - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):415-419.
Republicanism.Philip Pettit - 2000 - Mind 109 (435):640-644.
Shaftesbury on Life as a Work of Art.Michael B. Gill - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (6):1110-1131.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Locke on Persons and Personal Identity.Ruth Boeker - 2021 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Francis Hutcheson on Liberty.Ruth Boeker - 2020 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 88:121-142.
Locke's Moral Psychology.Ruth Boeker - 2021 - In Jessica Gordon-Roth & Shelley Weinberg (eds.), The Lockean Mind. Routledge.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Locke's Education For Liberty.Gary B. Herbert - 1990 - Review of Metaphysics 43 (3):651-652.
Democratical Gentlemen and the Lust for Mastery.Daniel Kapust - 2013 - Political Theory 41 (4):648-675.
Placing Plato in the History of Liberty.Melissa Lane - 2018 - History of European Ideas 44 (6):702-718.
Liberty: One or Two Concepts Liberty.Eric Nelson - 2005 - Political Theory 33 (1):58-78.
The Positive Foundation Of The Negative Liberty.Damian Leszczyński - 2012 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 7 (1):121-192.
Shaftesbury on Life as a Work of Art.Michael B. Gill - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (6):1110-1131.
Love of Humanity in Shaftesbury’s Moralists.Michael B. Gill - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (6):1117-1135.
Berlin’s Two Concepts of Positive Liberty.Janos Kis - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):31-48.
Liberty: One Concept Too Many?Eric Nelson - 2005 - Political Theory 33 (1):58 - 78.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-15

Total views
197 ( #59,196 of 2,507,375 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
99 ( #7,483 of 2,507,375 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes