Giving Voice to Patients: Developing a Discussion Method to Involve Patients in Translational Research

NanoEthics 12 (3):181-197 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Biomedical research policy in recent years has often tried to make such research more ‘translational’, aiming to facilitate the transfer of insights from research and development to health care for the benefit of future users. Involving patients in deliberations about and design of biomedical research may increase the quality of R&D and of resulting innovations and thus contribute to translation. However, patient involvement in biomedical research is not an easy feat. This paper discusses the development of a method for involving patients in biomedical research aiming to address its main challenges.After reviewing the potential challenges of patient involvement, we formulate three requirements for any method to meaningfully involve patients in biomedical research. It should enable patients to put forward their experiential knowledge, to develop a rich view of what an envisioned innovation might look like and do, and to connect their experiential knowledge with the envisioned innovation. We then describe how we developed the card-based discussion method ‘Voice of patients’, and discuss to what extent the method, when used in four focus groups, satisfied these requirements. We conclude that the method is quite successful in mobilising patients’ experiential knowledge, in stimulating their imaginaries of the innovation under discussion and to some extent also in connecting these two. More work is needed to translate patients’ considerations into recommendations relevant to researchers’ activities. It also seems wise to broaden the audience for patients’ considerations to other actors working on a specific innovation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Principlism Versus Utilitarianism In Translational Medicine Ethics.Mircea Leabu - 2011 - Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philosophia 2.
Vulnerable Brains: Research Ethics and Neurosurgical Patients.Paul J. Ford - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):73-82.
The interplay between autonomy and dignity: summarizing patients voices.Charlotte Delmar - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):975-981.
Surgical innovation as sui generis surgical research.Mianna Lotz - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (6):447-459.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-09

Downloads
25 (#595,425)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?