The end of religious exemptions from immunisation requirements?

Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (2):114-117 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose a middle ground in the debate over religious exemptions from measles vaccination requirements. It attempts to strike a balance between public health concerns on the one hand and religious objections on the other that avoids two equally serious errors: (1) making religious liberty an absolute and (2) disregarding religious beliefs altogether. Some think that the issue is straightforward: science has spoken and the benefits to public health outweigh any other concerns. The safety of the community, they say, demands that everybody be vaccinated so that measles outbreaks can be prevented, but such voices often ignore the freedom of religion, which is a mistake. Using Martha Nussbaum’s work on religious liberty, this paper claims that the exemptions should be preserved if a certain level of vaccination rates can be maintained.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-18

Downloads
37 (#620,269)

6 months
5 (#1,091,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Bock
University of Texas At Tyler

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references