Philosophia Mathematica 28 (3):296-316 (2020)

Francesca Boccuni
University Vita-Salute San Raffaele
Jack Woods
University of Leeds
Neofregeanism and structuralism are among the most promising recent approaches to the philosophy of mathematics. Yet both have serious costs. We develop a view, structuralist neologicism, which retains the central advantages of each while avoiding their more serious costs. The key to our approach is using arbitrary reference to explicate how mathematical terms, introduced by abstraction principles, refer. Focusing on numerical terms, this allows us to treat abstraction principles as implicit definitions determining all properties of the numbers, achieving a key neofregean advantage, while preserving the key structuralist advantage, which objects play the number role does not matter.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/philmat/nky017
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1985 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.
What Numbers Could Not Be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1981 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Framing the Epistemic Schism of Statistical Mechanics.Javier Anta - 2021 - Proceedings of the X Conference of the Spanish Society of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is Neologicism?Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):60-99.
Neologicist Nominalism.Rafal Urbaniak - 2010 - Studia Logica 96 (2):149-173.
Structuralist Perspective1.Bernhard Lauth - 1996 - In Wolfgang Balzer & Carlos Ulises Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 6--115.
A Rigorous Set Theoretical Foundation of the Structuralist Approach.H. Peter - 1996 - In Wolfgang Balzer & Carlos Ulises Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 6--233.
Logicism and Neologicism.Neil Tennant - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Cure for Theorrhea.Raymond Tallis - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (1):7-39.
Challenging the Spacetime Structuralist.Christian Wüthrich - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):1039-1051.


Added to PP index

Total views
70 ( #162,625 of 2,499,389 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,627 of 2,499,389 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes