Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions

Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (11):652-656 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the scriptural and theological reasons given by Jehovah's Witnesses (JWs) to refuse blood transfusions. Julian Savulescu and Richard W Momeyer argue that informed consent should be based on rational beliefs and that the refusal of blood transfusions by JWs is irrational, but after examining the reasons given by JWs, I challenge the claim that JW beliefs are irrational. I also question whether we should give up the traditional notion of informed consent

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,376

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusions.Helen M. Descombes - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (5):355.
Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs?J. Savulescu & R. W. Momeyer - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (5):282-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-14

Downloads
127 (#185,371)

6 months
27 (#134,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?