Journal of Business Ethics 99 (2):283 - 296 (2011)

Abstract
Despite the growing number of studies examining consumers' perceptions of unethical corporate and consumer practices, research examining the apparent double standard existing between what consumers perceive as acceptable corporate behaviour and what they believe are acceptable consumer practices remains scarce. Contradictory, double standards are often quoted by other researchers as a major stream in ethical literature.The few studies dealing with this topic as well as this study indicate that people rate corporate unethical actions as less admissible compared to similar consumer misactions. However, little is known about the processes underlying these double standards. This research investigates whether the techniques of neutralization could provide a meaningful way of approaching this phenomenon. Findings indicate that the higher the extent to which people agree with arguments explaining away the misbehaviour instigated by consumers or business, the more they tolerate these questionable consumer and corporate practices. Furthermore and more importantly, these techniques give an answer on the question why people judge business (representatives) more harshly than consumers. More specifically, results show that the same respondents who justify questionable consumer actions to a certain degree, condone the same misbehaviours instigated by business (representatives) to a much lesser extent. In this way, the techniques of neutralization concern a process explaining the double standard phenomenon
Keywords ethical beliefs  techniques of neutralization  double standards  corporate ethics  consumer ethics  VIRTUE  VALUES  PEOPLE  SETTINGS  DECISIONS  CONSUMER ETHICAL BELIEFS  FINAL CONSUMER  BEHAVIOR  RELIGIOSITY  BUSINESS
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0654-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Gender Differences in Double Standards.Iris Vermeir & Patrick Van Kenhove - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):281 - 295.
Consumer Ethics: The Role of Self-Regulatory Focus.Tine De Bock & Patrick Van Kenhove - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):241 - 255.
Consumer Reactions to Unethical Service Recovery.Elizabeth C. Alexander - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 36 (3):223 - 237.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-29

Total views
16 ( #668,374 of 2,517,923 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,923 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes