Phronesis 65 (3):355-378 (2020)

Authors
Susanne Bobzien
Oxford University
Abstract
Since Mates’ seminal Stoic Logic there has been uncertainty and debate about how to treat the term anapodeiktos when used of Stoic syllogisms. This paper argues that the customary translation of anapodeiktos by ‘indemonstrable’ is accurate, and it explains why this is so. At the heart of the explanation is an argument that, contrary to what is commonly assumed, indemonstrability is rooted in the generic account of the Stoic epistemic notion of demonstration. Some minor insights into Stoic logic ensue.
Keywords Stoic logic  demonstration  indemonstrables  Stoic syllogistic  Stoic epistemology  ancient logic  Stoic philosophy  Hellenistic philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15685284-12342145
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Development of Logic.William Calvert Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Stoic Logic.Benson Mates - 1953 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. I.Gerhard Gentzen - 1935 - Mathematische Zeitschrift 35:176–210.
The Development of Logic.William Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Philosophy 40 (151):79-83.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Logic: The Stoics (Part Two).Susanne Bobzien - 1999 - In Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Stoic Syllogistic.Susanne Bobzien - 1996 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:133-92.
Stoic Logic.Susanne Bobzien - 2003 - In Brad Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Is Stoic Logic Classical?Marek Nasieniewski - 1998 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 6:55.
Review of Rene Brouwer, The Stoic Sage, Cambridge, 2014. [REVIEW]Vanessa de Harven - forthcoming - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 100 (2).
Chrysippus’ Indemonstrables and Mental Logic.Miguel López-Astorga - 2015 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (1):1-15.
Reservation in Stoic Ethics.Tad Brennan - 2000 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 82 (2):149-177.
Logic, History Of: Ancient Logic.Susanne Bobzien - 2006 - In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Thomson Gale.
Aristotelian Versus Stoic Logic.J. Banas - 2003 - Filozofia 58 (8):551-563.
Die stoische Modallogik (Stoic Modal Logic).Susanne Bobzien - 1986 - Wuerzburg: Koenigshausen and Neumann.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-12-21

Total views
208 ( #51,611 of 2,462,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #19,241 of 2,462,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes