Against Williamson's Arguments About Bivalence

Philosophical Forum 47 (3-4):325-340 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On 'the denial of bivalence is absurd'.F. J. Pelletier & R. J. Stainton - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):369 – 382.
Williamson on Bivalence.Miroslava Andjelkovic - 1999 - Acta Analytica 14 (1).
Andjelkovic on bivalence: a reply'.Timothy Williamson - 1999 - Acta Analytica 14 (23):35-8.
Bivalence and what is said.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (1):167–190.
Discussions: Vagueness and Bivalence: A Discussion of Williamson and Simons.B. J. Copeland - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 (1):193-200.
Truth, Falsity, and Borderline Cases.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophical Topics 28 (1):211-244.
Excluded middle and bivalence.TimothyJ Day - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (1):93 - 97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-16

Downloads
23 (#584,438)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bo Chen
Wuhan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references