The Prospect of an Aristotelian Biology

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:89-101 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent decades, a growing number of biologists has testified to the priority of the whole organism with respect to its parts and protested against the dominance of mechanist and reductionist accounts of the organism in biological science. To see disinterested inquiry thus shaped “by constraint of facts” will delight, but cannot surprise, an Aristotelian. Taking this rediscovery of nature by biologists as an occasion for reflection, this essay considers, first, what is presupposed by any healthy biological inquiry, second, the prospects of renewal for the science itself, and, finally, a good that could follow from such a renewal. Aristotelian biology is an invitation to consider the forms of living things. Since “philosophy claims to know”, philosophers are called to bear witness to the primacy of form and, like biologists, to be models of attentiveness to form.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Prospect of an Aristotelian Biology.Christopher O. Blum - 2013 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:89-101.
Organism and Organization.Elias L. Khalil - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (1):119-126.
Evolutionary essentialism.Denis Walsh - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):425-448.
Calculating life? Duelling discourses in interdisciplinary systems biology.Jane Calvert & Joan H. Fujimura - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):155-163.
The Death of Molecular Biology?Michel Morange - 2008 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 30 (1):31 - 42.
David Hull’s Natural Philosophy of Science.Paul E. Griffiths - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):301-310.
The Conception of Life in Synthetic Biology.Anna Https://Orcidorg Deplazes-Zemp - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):757-774.
Biology as Social Theory: John Scott Haldane and Physiological Regulation.Steve Sturdy - 1988 - British Journal for the History of Science 21 (3):315-340.
The Structure of Biological Science.Alexander Rosenberg - 1985 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Naturalists, Molecular Biologists, and the Challenges of Molecular Evolution.Joel B. Hagen - 1999 - Journal of the History of Biology 32 (2):321 - 341.
Recent philosophy of biology: A review.David L. Hull - 2002 - Acta Biotheoretica 50 (2):117-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
2 (#1,780,599)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Blum
Thomas More College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references