Mating Markets: A Naturally Selected Sex Allocation Theory of Sexual Selection

Biological Theory 14 (2):103-111 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article utilizes three premises. There are commonly ecologically oriented, naturally selected specialized differences in frequency and/or quality as well as sexually selected differences between the sexes. Sex in the sense of coming together and going apart or going apart and coming together is trade in these naturally selected differences, i.e., there is a mating market in sexual species. While such trade is beneficial to the population as a whole, sexual competition and selection is conflict over the profits of that trade and can be detrimental to the population as a whole. These premises yield a naturally selected sex allocation theory of the possible directions and forms of sexual selection, i.e., one that includes costs as well as frequencies. This can explain conventional sex roles, the sex-role reversed, inter- as well as intrasexual selection, and passive as well as active choice. Any of these alternatives may be over mates, over gametes, or both. A hypothetical example based on density dependence relative to resources is provided, one that suggests that centrioles may be a cytoplasmic resource in males in multicellular animals, and which are the target of active choice and the mechanism of manipulation in passive female choice. As a whole, the approach yields a truly general theory of sexual selection, provides an alternative to the mechanism for Fisher’s principle, and gives a theoretical explanation for Mayr’s biological species definition.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moderators of sex differences in sexual selection theory.Anthony D. Pellegrini - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):285 - 286.
Darwin's Beautiful Notion: Sexual Selection and the Plurality of Moral Codes.Jason A. Tipton - 1999 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 21 (2):119 - 135.
Cognitive Traits as Sexually Selected Fitness Indicators.John Klasios - 2013 - Review of General Psychology 17 (4):428-442.
Refining the sexual selection explanation within an ethological framework.John Archer - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):292-311.
Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?John Archer - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):249-266.


Added to PP

25 (#465,168)

6 months
1 (#447,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations