The Pediatrician's Dilemma: Refusing the Refusers of Infant Vaccines

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (3):648-653 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dealing with the continuously increasing rates of families wanting to either significantly delay or completely postpone their infant's vaccines has created an alarmingly untenable dilemma for the general pediatricians dealing with these families on a daily basis. Pediatricians must decide whether to continue to provide substandard care by foregoing many or most of the infant's highly recommended protective vaccines, or whether to dismiss from the practice the family who refuses vaccines. Much has been written about why they should retain these families, but this paper will discuss some reasonable rationales as to why nearly 40% of pediatricians choose dismissal of these families

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethically compromised vaccines and catholic teaching.Kevin McGovern & Brussen - 2011 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 17 (2):1.
Function of infant-directed speech.Marilee Monnot - 1999 - Human Nature 10 (4):415-443.
Ethically compromised vaccines in Australia.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 17 (3):1.
Vaccination Policies.Marcel Verweij - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-20

Downloads
45 (#346,111)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?