Is the official theory of mind absurd?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):167-183 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/21.2.167

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A set of solutions to Parfit's problems.Stuart Rachels - 2001 - Noûs 35 (2):214–238.
Deductive closure and the sorites.Matt Weiner - unknown
The digital absurd.Steven Hodges - unknown
Death as a Loss.Brian Sayers - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (2):149-159.
The Absurdity of Life.Steven Luper - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52:1-17.
Absurd environmentalism.Douglas K. Detterman, Lynne T. Gabriel & Joanne M. Ruthsatz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):411-412.
The Concept of Mind: 60th Anniversary Edition.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - New York: Hutchinson & Co.
Fodor’s Challenge to the Classical Computational Theory of Mind.Kirk Ludwig & Susan Schneider - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (1):123–143.
The Official Doctrine and its Relevance Today.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2009 - PARISHEELAN (No.3):14-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
111 (#156,045)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Explanation and analysis in Strawson's persons.David Bloor - 1970 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):2-9.
Explanation and analysis in Strawson's 'Persons'.David Bloor - 1970 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):2-9.
Common Sense Metaphysics.N. M. L. Nathan - 1971 - Philosophy 46 (176):152 - 157.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references