Science advice: making credences accurate

Synthese 200 (2) (2022)

Abstract

Policy-makers often rely on scientists to inform their decisions. When advising policy-makers, what should scientists say? One view says that scientists ought to say what they have a high credence in. Another view says that scientists ought to say what they expect to lead to good policy outcomes. We explore a third view: scientists ought to say what they expect to make the policy-makers’ credences accurate.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-16

Downloads
8 (#1,014,522)

6 months
8 (#90,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Deniz Sarikaya
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Simon Blessenohl
University of Southern California (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Accuracy and Evidence.Richard Pettigrew - 2013 - Dialectica 67 (4):579-596.
Philosophical Advice.David Archard - forthcoming - Philosophy.
Accuracy and Educated Guesses.Sophie Horowitz - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 6.
Science, Policy, Values: Exploring the Nexus.Heather E. Douglas - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (5):475-480.
Rational Probabilistic Incoherence.Michael Caie - 2013 - Philosophical Review 122 (4):527-575.
Mass-Mediated Expertise as Informal Policy Advice.Hans Peter Peters, Harald Heinrichs & Imme Petersen - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (6):865-887.
Using Science, Making Policy: What Should We Worry About?Eleonora Montuschi - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (1):57-78.
The Role of Science in Public Policy: Higher Reason, or Reason for Hire? [REVIEW]Stephen F. Haller & James Gerrie - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (2):139-165.