History and Theory 50 (3):358-372 (2011)

Abstract
ABSTRACTIntellectual historians often make empirical claims, but can never know for certain if these claims are right. Uncertainty is thus inevitable for intellectual historians. But accepting uncertainty is not enough: we should also act on it, by trying to reduce and report it. We can reduce uncertainty by amassing valid data from different sources to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of competing explanations, rather than trying to “prove” an empirical claim by looking for evidence that fits it. Then we should report our degree of certainty in our claims. When we answer empirical questions in intellectual history, we are not telling our readers what happened: we are telling them how strong we think our evidence is—a crucial shift of emphasis. For intellectual historians, then, uncertainty is subjective, as discussed by Keynes and Collingwood; the paper thus explores three differences between subjective and objective uncertainty. Having outlined the theoretical basis of uncertainty, the paper then offers examples from actual research: Noel Malcolm's work shows how to reduce and report uncertainty about composition, and David Wootton's work shows how to reduce and report uncertainty about beliefs
Keywords uncertainty  history of ideas  Quentin Skinner  history of political thought  Collingwood  methodology  interpretation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00590.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Meanings and Understandings in the History of Ideas.Adrian Blau - 2020 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 14 (2):232-256.
Plato's Lost Lecture.Bennett Gilbert - 2012 - Dissertation, Reed College
Evidencia crucial: la teoría de la obligación contractual de Hobbes.Luciano Venezia - 2016 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 5 (8):151-184.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The History of Ideas as Philosophy and History.Michael Rosen - 2011 - History of Political Thought 32 (4):691-720.
Quentin Skinner and Jacques Derrida on Power and the State.Michael Drolet - 2007 - History of European Ideas 33 (2):234-255.
Bringing Metaphysics Back In?Barry Hindess - 2014 - History of European Ideas 40 (1):1-6.
Machiavelli and Republicanism.Gisela Bock, Quentin Skinner & Maurizio Viroli (eds.) - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
30 ( #381,147 of 2,506,844 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,844 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes