The Arguments of the Tombs of the Unknown: Relationality and National Legitimation [Book Review]

Argumentation 25 (4):449-468 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the wake of the First World War, a new form of commemoration emerged internationally, but in each case focused upon a new kind of national “hero”—the unknown soldier or warrior. The first instances appeared in France and Britain in 1920, followed by the United States in 1921, and Belgium in 1922. Other nations followed suit over the years, with the most recent WWI Unknown Soldier monument dedicated in 2004, in New Zealand. The motivational calculus of these national tombs was, of course, the massive number of combatant dead whose remains could not be identified. This paper takes up the two very different arguments composed by these commemorative sites. The first argument was directed to surviving family members and was articulated most explicitly by the French as a hypothetical enthymeme “this could be your husband, your father, your brother,” etc. The second argument has been directed to national and international collectives as a constitutive proclamation of legitimated nation-state or Empire Although this argument is particularly explicit in postcolonial gestures of independence on the part of former dominions of old empires, it was evident in even the earliest cases of the tombs of the unknown

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

History's remains: Of memory, mourning, and the event.Michael Naas - 2003 - Research in Phenomenology 33 (1):75-96.
A user's guide to design arguments.Trent Dougherty & Ted Poston - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (1):99-110.
Nations beyond nationalism.Helder7 De Schutter - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):378 – 394.
Two arguments against realism.Author unknown - manuscript
Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument.Author unknown - manuscript
How to argue for the value of humanity.Adrienne M. Martin - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):96-125.
Is There a Right of National Defense?Thomas Peard - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:341-347.
The justification of national partiality.Thomas Hurka - 1997 - In Jeff McMahan & Robert McKim (eds.), The Morality of Nationalism. New York, USA: Oxford Unversity Press. pp. 139-57.
Hardining national Parks.Daniel L. Dustin & Leo H. McAvoy - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (1):39-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-18

Downloads
58 (#270,773)

6 months
18 (#135,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Visual rhetoric and/as critical pedagogy.Brian L. Ott & Greg Dickinson - 2009 - In A. Lunsford, K. Wilson & R. Eberly (eds.), Sage Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Sage Publications.
Boundaries.Maya Lin - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):198-200.

Add more references