Honor in the military and the possible implication for the traditional separation of jus ad bellum and jus in bello

In Applied Ethics Series (Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy). pp. 94-102 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Traditional just war theory maintains that the two types of rules that govern justice in times of war, jus ad bellum (justice of war) and jus in bello (justice in war), are logically independent of one another. Call this the independence thesis. According to this thesis, a war that satisfies the ad bellum rules does not guarantee that the in bello rules will be satisfied; and a war that violates the ad bellum rules does not guarantee that the in bello rules will be violated. A controversial implication of this is that it’s possible for soldiers to undergo acts that are instrumental in bringing about victory in an unjust war and yet do nothing morally wrong. Some authors – call them purists – claim that this cannot be correct. Participating in an unjust war is by itself morally wrong. Yitzhak Benbaji has given what is to my mind the strongest defense of the independence thesis. In this paper I critically examine Benbaji’s argument and conclude that it is not persuasive. My argument against Benbaji incorporates the concept of honor in the military. I seek to show, in part, that if the recent literature is correct concerning both the nature of honor and the importance of instilling it in soldiers, then Benbaji hasn’t given the purist a compelling reason to give up her view.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The war convention and the moral division of labour.Yitzhak Benbaji - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):593-617.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Order and Affray: Defensive Privileges in Warfare.Toby Handfield & Patrick Emerton - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):382 - 414.
How to judge soldiers whose cause is unjust.Judith Lichtenberg - 2008 - In David Rodin & Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford University Press. pp. 112--130.
Considerações sobre a Guerra E Paz em meio à soberania Das nações.Augusto Bach - 2013 - Cadernos de Ética E Filosofia Política 22:105-121.
The Incoherence of Walzer’s Just War Theory.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (1):693-733.
Military and Civil Reasons For Just Behavior in War.Ovadia Ezra - 2012 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 19 (2):39-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-11

Downloads
567 (#29,908)

6 months
57 (#72,547)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacob Blair
California State University, Hayward

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the moral equality of combatants.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (4):377–393.
The war convention and the moral division of labour.Yitzhak Benbaji - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):593-617.
Courage in the Military: Physical and Moral.Peter Olsthoorn - 2007 - Journal of Military Ethics 6 (4):270-279.
Magnanimity and Integrity as Military Virtues.Paul Robinson - 2007 - Journal of Military Ethics 6 (4):259-269.

Add more references