Dynamical learning algorithms for neural networks and neural constructivism

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):559-559 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present commentary addresses the Quartz & Sejnowski (Q&S) target article from the point of view of the dynamical learning algorithm for neural networks. These techniques implicitly adopt Q&S's neural constructivist paradigm. Their approach hence receives support from the biological and psychological evidence. Limitations of constructive learning for neural networks are discussed with an emphasis on grammar learning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the learning paradox resolved?M. E. J. Raijmakers - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):573-574.
Out of their minds: Legal theory in neural networks. [REVIEW]Dan Hunter - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):129-151.
A step in the right direction.Mary Ann Metzger - 1993 - Journal Od Mathematical Psychology 37 (3):477-485.
The Fables of Lucy R.: Association and Dissociation in Neural Networks.Dan Lloyd - 1998 - In Dan J. Stein & J. Ludick (eds.), Neural Networks and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 248--273.
Some Neural Networks Compute, Others Don't.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2008 - Neural Networks 21 (2-3):311-321.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#393,031)

6 months
10 (#235,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references