Conductive Argument: A New Type of Defeasible Reasoning

College Publications (2011)

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Anthony Blair
University of Windsor

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Conduction: A Reply to Adler.J. Anthony Blair - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):109-128.
Weighing Considerations in Conductive Pro and Con Arguments.Thomas Fischer - 2011 - In John Anthony Blair & Ralph H. Johnson (eds.), Conductive Argument: A New Type of Defeasible Reasoning. London, UK: College Publications. pp. 86-103.
Are Conductive Arguments Possible?Jonathan Adler - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):245-257.
Argumenty kondukcyjne.Marcin Selinger - 2014 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 9 (4):53-63.
Self-Defeating Arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.
Conductive Arguments: Why is This Still a Thing?Kevin Possin - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (4):563-593.
The Myth of Conductive Arguments.Kevin Possin - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):29-33.