Conductive Argument: A New Type of Defeasible Reasoning

& (eds.)
College Publications (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

Weighing Considerations in Conductive Pro and Con Arguments.Thomas Fischer

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Conduction: A Reply to Adler.J. Anthony Blair - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):109-128.
J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson (eds): Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning. [REVIEW]Jan Albert Laar - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):337-344.
Weighing Considerations in Conductive Pro and Con Arguments.Thomas Fischer - 2011 - In John Anthony Blair & Ralph H. Johnson (eds.), Conductive Argument: A New Type of Defeasible Reasoning. College Publications. pp. 86-103.
Are Conductive Arguments Possible?Jonathan Adler - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):245-257.
Conductive Argument, An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning.Fabio Paglieri - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (3):438-461.
From Critical Thinking to Non-conclusive Argument and Back Again. [REVIEW]Paul A. Wagner - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):34-38.
J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson (eds): Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning: College Publications, London, 2011. [REVIEW]Jan Albert van Laar - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):337-344.
Argumenty kondukcyjne.Marcin Selinger - 2014 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 9 (4):53-63.
Self-defeating arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.
Conductive Arguments: Why is This Still a Thing?Kevin Possin - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (4):563-593.
Conductive Argument as a Mode of Strategic Maneuvering.Yun Xie - 2017 - Informal Logic 37 (1):2-22.
The Myth of Conductive Arguments.Kevin Possin - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):29-33.
Faulty Reasoning About Default Principles in Cosmological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):242-249.
Arguing Conductively or Arguing Strategically?Xie Yun - unknown
Defeasible reasoning, special pleading and the cosmological argument: A reply to Oppy.Robert C. Koons - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):192-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Anthony Blair
University of Windsor

Citations of this work

Epistemology Mathematicized.John Woods - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (2):292-331.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references