Review of measurement instruments in clinical and research ethics, 1999-2003 [Book Review]

Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):153-156 (2006)

Abstract

Every field of practice has the responsibility to evaluate its outcomes and to test its theories. Evidence of the underdevelopment of measurement instruments in bioethics suggests that attending to strengthening existing instruments and developing new ones will facilitate the interpretation of accumulating bodies of research as well as the making of clinical judgements. A review of 65 instruments reported in the published literature showed 10 with even a minimal level of psychometric data. Two newly developed instruments provide examples of the full use of psychometric and ethical theory. Bioethicists use a wide range of methods for knowledge development and verification; each method should meet stringent standards of quality

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
7 (#1,075,983)

6 months
1 (#386,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
A Plea for Pragmatism in Clinical Research Ethics.David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
The Epistemology of Measurement: A Model-Based Account.Eran Tal - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Toronto
Ethical Issues in Translational Research.Carlo Petrini - 2010 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):517-533.
The Critical Turn in Clinical Ethics and its Continous Enhancement.Laurence B. McCullough - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):1 – 8.