Review of Rik Peels' Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology [Book Review]

Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 201710 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this book, Rik Peels provides a comprehensive original account of intellectual duties, doxastic blameworthiness, and responsible belief. The discussions, relating to work in epistemology as well as moral responsibility, are clear and often provide useful entries into the literature. Though I disagree with some of the main conclusions, the arguments are carefully laid out and typically merit a good amount of thought even where one remains unconvinced. After providing an overview of the contents, I specifically suggest that Peels theory fails to account for one important kind of doxastic obligations and doxastic blame.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-18

Downloads
355 (#71,678)

6 months
71 (#81,805)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gunnar Björnsson
Stockholm University

References found in this work

Explaining away epistemic skepticism about culpability.Gunnar Björnsson - 2013 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford studies in agency and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 141–164.

Add more references