Policy on critiques and replies: Psychological Review

Psychological Review 103 (1):3-4 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0092847

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Some facets of consistency: Replies to Epstein, Funder, and Bem.Walter Mischel & Philip K. Peake - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):394-402.
Evolution, Neutrality, and Antecedent Probability: a Reply to Van Till and McMullin.Alvin Plantinga - 1991 - Christian Scholar's Review 21 (1):80-109.
Mental imagery of students: A summary of the replies given to Titchener's questionary by 118 juniors in Vassar college.F. C. French - 1902 - Psychological Review 9 (1):40-56.
A Reply To The Current Critiques Formulated Against Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics.Marian Eabrasu - 2009 - Libertarian Papers 1:20.
Probability theory plus noise: Replies to Crupi and Tentori (2016) and to Nilsson, Juslin, and Winman (2016).Fintan Costello & Paul Watts - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (1):112-123.
Adolescence Matters: Practice‐ and Policy‐Relevant Research and Engagement in Psychological Anthropology.Jill E. Korbin & Eileen P. Anderson-Fye - 2011 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 39 (4):415-425.
Errors in recent critiques of Gestalt psychology. 1. Sources of confusion.Raymond Holder Wheeler, F. Theodore Perkins & S. Howard Bartly - 1931 - Psychological Review 38 (2):109-136.
Errors in the critiques of Gestalt psychology. III. Inconsistencies in Thorndike's system.Raymond H. Wheeler, F. Theodore Perkins & S. Howard Bartley - 1933 - Psychological Review 40 (4):303-323.
Errors in the critiques of Gestalt psychology. IV. Inconsistencies in Woodworth, Spearman and McDougall.Raymond H. Wheeler, F. Theodore Perkins & S. Howard Bartley - 1933 - Psychological Review 40 (5):412-433.
Errors in the critiques of Gestalt psychology. II. Confused interpretations of the historical approach.Raymond H. Wheeler, F. Theodore Perkins & S. Howard Bartley - 1933 - Psychological Review 40 (3):221-245.
The Purgative Rationale for the Death Penalty: Replies to Steiker and Danaher.Matthew H. Kramer - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (2):379-394.
A Reply To Critics Of Constitutional Goods.Alan Brudner - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22 (2):237-266.
Editorial.Robert A. Bjork - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (1):3-3.
BMJ response to Dr. Gupta.N. Craft & R. Smith - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (4):245-246.
“If You Work in This Country You Should Not be Poor, and Your Kids Should be Doing Better”: Bringing Mixed Methods and Theory in Psychological Anthropology to Improve Research in Policy and Practice.Thomas S. Weisner - 2011 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 39 (4):455-476.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references