A New Foundation for the Social Sciences? Searle’s Misreading of Durkheim

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (1):53-82 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The aim of John Searle’s philosophy of society is to provide a foundation for the social sciences. Arguing that the study of social reality needs to be based on a philosophy of language, Searle claims that sociology has little to offer since no sociologist ever took language seriously. Attacking Durkheim head-on, Searle not only claims that Durkheim’s project differs from his own but also that Durkheim’s sociology has serious shortcomings. Opposing Searle, this paper argues that Durkheim’s account of social reality is still viable and that Searle’s attack backfires on his own theoretical project



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 78,094

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Durkheim.Gianfranco Poggi - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Making Sense of Durkheim’s Methodological Prescriptions.Renan Springer de Freitas - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):539-551.
The Construction of Social Reality: An Exchange.Barry Smith & John Searle - 2003 - American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62 (2):285-309.


Added to PP

99 (#130,914)

6 months
4 (#202,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jørn Bjerre
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations