Will the Real Apollo Please Stand Up? Rand, Nietzsche, and the Reason-Emotion Dichotomy

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 10 (2):343 - 369 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author probes the "Tower of Babel" effect surrounding Western civilization's long-standing fascination with the Greek god Apollo. He clarifies the reason-emotion dichotomy and shows the Classical-Romantic opposition of Apollo and Dionysus, as adopted by Ayn Rand and (supposedly) Friedrich Nietzsche, to be an inaccurate way to characterize either Apollo (god of reason) or Dionysus (god of emotion). Temperament theorist David Keirsey's linkage of Apollo with emotion is found similarly wanting, and an argument based on insights of personality type theorist Janet Germane is offered that Apollo instead is most fundamentally the god of intuition

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emotions and Religious Ethics.Paul Lauritzen - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):307 - 324.
Mann contra Nietzsche.Jerry S. Clegg - 2004 - Philosophy and Literature 28 (1):157-164.
Nietzsche, Rand, and the Ethics of the Great Task.Peter Saint-Andre - 2009 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 10 (2):329-342.
Reason, Emotion, and the Importance of Philosophy.Wayne A. Davis - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):1-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Beneath The DIM Hypothesis.Roger E. Bissell - 2013 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 13 (2):160-204.
The Future of Art Criticism: Objectivism Goes to the Movies.Kyle Barrowman - 2018 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 18 (2):165-228.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references