Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1):119-144 (2012)

The extension of human rights obligations to corporations raises questions about whose rights and which rights corporations are responsible for. This paper gives a partial answer by asking what legal rights corporations would need to have to fulfil various sorts of human rights obligations. We should compare thechances of human rights fulfilment (and violations) that are likely to result from assigning human rights obligations to corporations with the chances of humanrights fulfilment (and violations) that are likely to result from giving corporations the legal rights needed to undertake those human rights obligations. Corporationsshould respect basic human rights of all people. Non-complicity in human rights violations requires that corporations have the right to political freedom of speech.To actively protect people from human rights violations, corporations need the right to hire armed security personnel; such obligations should be limited to protecting corporate property and narrowly defined stakeholders. Obligations to spend corporate resources on human rights fulfilment are confined to contributing to specific projects. Corporations have no obligation to ensure a society in which human rights are fulfilled. This principle helps us understand why corporate obligations are substantially different from those of governments
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1052-150X
DOI 10.5840/beq20122217
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Social Choice and Individual Values.Irving M. Copi - 1952 - Science and Society 16 (2):181-181.
The Corporation as a Moral Person.Peter A. French - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3):207 - 215.
Taking Rights Seriously.Thomas D. Perry - 1977 - Ethics 88 (1):80-86.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Confucian Ethics and Labor Rights.Tae Wan Kim - 2014 - Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (4):565-594.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Human Rights and Positive Corporate Duties: The Importance of Corporate–State Interaction.Ivar Kolstad - 2012 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 21 (3):276-285.
Business and Human Rights.Michelle Westermann-Behaylo & Harry J. van Buren Iii - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:99-110.
Business Obligations for Human Rights: Any Progress From Rhetoric to Practice?Mercy Berman & Jeanne M. Logsdon - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:189-201.
Corporate Property Rights.Larry May - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):225 - 232.
Corporations and Global Human Rights: Definition, Enforcement, Funding.Duane Windsor - 2010 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:1-11.
History, Human Rights, and Globalization.Sumner B. Twiss - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (1):39-70.


Added to PP index

Total views
69 ( #169,836 of 2,533,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes